Welcome to PPP/C Friends and Family feeding trough. How can we trust a government that has failed to adequately explain awarding the Synergy contract? How can we trust a government that would not pass a Freedom of Information Act? If a government would seek to rewrite history, as printed in books, newspapers etc, why would it not rewrite, edit or delete by a single click of a mouse, a notice or ad? The move to a website is the ultimate act to support government secrecy. It seeks at every turn to avoid accountability to citizens and eliminate freedom of the press. However, it has taken every step to demonstrate closed and opaque, rather than transparent governance. RED HERRING FALLACY WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH THE ISSUES THAT ARE BEING DISCUSSED - Waiting Skeleton. This fallacy grants an argument that may be correct but does not address the subject being discussed. For this purpose, an unrelated question is introduced in the conversation. This government says it supports democracy. The Red herring fallacy is a type of error that is used as a way of diverting people’s attention from the original topic under discussion. You’ve probably heard people use red herrings in arguments. The argument for the change in policy is void of true appreciation for the historical and legislative basis for publishing these types of public notices in newspapers. The red herring fallacy, one of the many logical fallacies you might encounter in essays, speeches, opinion pieces, and even casual conversations, is an attempt to reroute a discussion from its original topic and focus on something unrelated. ![]() When will the Government cap the extent President’s travel expenditures? When will the Government stick to allocated budgets for ministries and projects? When will the people get a true accounting of public monies spent on various social, cultural, and natural disaster events? When will the Government cap the extent of expenditures to entities owned and operated by known members and friends of the PPP/C and the Government? However, the Government is seeking to “capping the extent of expenditures” that will affect the only group that seeks to expose the yaws of government’s mismanagement, corruption, waste, fraud and abuse. ![]() The Government that has squandered millions on taxpayers’ dollars on projects that were not necessary misused funds allocated by Parliament failed to seek repayment of taxpayers’ funds from contractors who breached contracts and delivered substandard work that could not meet stone-age standards. The Government has failed to use technology advancement to improve its budgetary and financial reporting process. If we take the CS at his word, the intent of the Government is to save cost and utilize technological advancement. ![]() The Cabinet Secretary’s (CS) statements as reported in SN of August 27, 2010, smacks of arrogance, feeble minded thinking, and surreptitious intent. If you bring up the hatred you are faced with, Brazilians will quickly use the rude herring argument fallacy, unable to ever take responsibility for the. This is unprincipled and a smelly red herring
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |